HomeTechnical Resources › Media Compatibility
Where stainless works, and where it does not

Media Compatibility

Ratings for common media, and an honest account of the three mechanisms that cause most unexpected failures.

Choosing the grade is choosing the failure mode you are prepared to live with. Austenitic stainless handles a very wide range of media, but it has specific, well-understood vulnerabilities — and knowing where they are is more useful than a claim that it resists everything.

Rating scale

RatingMeaning
ASuitable
CConditional — depends on concentration and temperature. Ask us.
XNot recommended. Use a PTFE-lined hose or a special alloy.

Common media

MediumSS 304LSS 316LNotes
Water — fresh, DM, condensateAA
Steam, saturated or superheatedAAApply the derating table
Seawater, brine, chloridesXCPitting risk — 904L, super duplex or PTFE-lined preferred
Nitrogen, argon, heliumAA
Compressed airAA
Natural gas, CNGAA
LPGAA
HydrogenCA316L preferred; consult us for high-pressure hydrogen
OxygenCCO₂-clean preparation mandatory; velocity limits apply
Ammonia, anhydrousAA
Carbon dioxide, dryAAWet CO₂ becomes carbonic acid → C
Diesel, fuel oils, lube oilAA
Ethanol, methanolAA
Acetone, ketonesAA
Toluene, xylene, aromaticsAA
Caustic soda, dilute, ambientAAHot or concentrated → C
Nitric acid, diluteAAFuming or hot → C
Phosphoric acidCCDilute and cold acceptable in 316L; hot → 904L
Sulphuric acidXCOnly very dilute and cold; otherwise 904L or PTFE-lined
Hydrochloric acidXXPTFE-lined only
Chlorine, dry gasCCWet chlorine → X, PTFE-lined
Milk, dairy, beverageAASanitary tri-clamp, crevice-free welds
Vegetable oils, syrupsAA
Indicative, at ambient temperature, for preliminary selection. EWPL Catalogue 2026, Section 16.
This is a starting point, not a specification. Corrosion behaviour depends on concentration, temperature, aeration, velocity and contamination. We confirm the final material against your enquiry data. For aggressive or mixed media the answer is usually a PTFE-lined assembly or a special alloy.

The three mechanisms that actually cause trouble

Chloride stress corrosion cracking

The single most common cause of unexpected austenitic stainless failure. It needs three things together: chlorides, tensile stress and temperature above roughly 60 °C. A corrugated hose has residual forming stress built into it by definition, so two of the three conditions are already present in the product. Where chlorides are in the medium — or in the insulation, or in the coastal atmosphere outside the hose — the risk has to be assessed rather than assumed away.

Pitting and crevice corrosion

Localised breakdown of the passive layer, usually chloride-driven, and much worse in stagnant conditions than in flowing ones. It is why a hose that sat full of seawater over a shutdown can fail in weeks when the same hose in continuous service ran for years. 316L, with its molybdenum, resists it considerably better than 304L.

Intergranular attack

Chromium carbide precipitation at grain boundaries after sustained exposure in the 450–850 °C range, leaving the boundaries chromium-depleted and vulnerable. The low carbon grades (304L, 316L) and the stabilised grades (321) exist to control it. This is the reason we ask before publishing a pressure for 316L above 450 °C.

Hydrogen. 316L is the preferred grade. For high-pressure hydrogen, talk to us first — pressure, purity, temperature, cycling and moisture all move the answer, and a single rating on a web page would be misleading.
This chart is a starting point, not a specification. Concentration, temperature, velocity, aeration, entrained solids and stagnation all move these ratings. Where the duty is critical, send us the full conditions.

Tell us about the job. We will work out what it needs.

Send the medium, pressure, temperature, movement and end connections — or just describe the problem. You get back a specified assembly and a drawing, and a price once the specification is settled.

Talk to an engineer  What we need to quote